Sunday, August 4, 2019
Capital Punishment :: essays research papers
 Capital Punishment        Thesis One: In principle a case can be made on moral grounds both supporting and  opposing capital punishment.    Thesis two: Concretely and in practice, compelling arguments against capital  punishment can be made on the basis of its actual administration in our society.      Two different cases can be made. One is based on justice and the nature of a  moral community. This leads to a defense of capital punishment. The second is  based on love and the nature of an ideal spiritual community. This leads to a  rejection of capital punishment.    JUSTICE AND THE NATURE OF MORAL COMMUNITY    A central principle of a just society is that every person has an equal right to  "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Within that framework, an  argument for capital punishment can be formulated along the following lines:  some acts are so vile and so destructive of community that they invalidate the  right of the perpetrator to membership and even to life. A community founded on  moral principles has certain requirements. The right to belong to a community is  not unconditional. The privilege of living and pursuing the good life in society  is not absolute. It may be negated by behavior that undermines the nature of a  moral community. The essential basis on which community is built requires each  citizen to honor the rightful claims of others. The utter and deliberate denial  of life and opportunity to others forfeits ones own claim to continued  membership in the community, whose standards have been so flagrantly violated.  The preservation of moral community demands that the shattering of the  foundation of its existence must be taken with utmost seriousness. The  preciousness of life in a moral community must be so highly honored that those  who do not honor the life of others make null and void their own right to  membership. Those who violate the personhood of others, especially if this is  done persistently as a habit must pay the ultimate penalty. This punishment must  be inflicted for the sake of maintaining the community whose foundation has been  violated. We can debate whether some non-lethal alternative is a fitting  substitute for the death penalty. But the standard of judgment is whether the  punishment fits the crime and sufficiently honors the nature of moral community.      LOVE AND AN IDEAL SPIRITUAL COMMUNITY    Agape, Christian love, is unconditional. It does not depend on the worthiness or  merit of those to whom it is directed. It is persistent in seeking the good of  others regardless of whether they return the favor or even deserve to be treated  well on the basis of their own incessant wrongdoing.  					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.